2009年10月21日星期三

公告华社 - 宽中危机-2009年10月25日早上8點半在寬柔楊文富講堂外集合

公告华社
背景资料
新山宽柔中学董事会将于20091025日上午10点召开特大,寻求修改11条章程。这11条章程被修改后,董事会随时能够把宽中的资产抵押,以进行投资。经过两个星期的了解与调查,我们发现特大有以下不合法,不合理,不合情之议程:-
提案1:核准公司注册批准及部长认可的章程修改条文。这其中涉及11项修改章程:-
1234


修改后:- 会员入会资格由董事会全权决定,现有教职员被剥夺会员资格,入会费暴涨10倍至RM300.00,而且入会后一年内不享有投票与被选权。
后果:关闭门户,拒绝广大华社与教育工作者参与宽中的建设,沦为董事局的私有产物


5678
修改后:-由会员要求召开的大会须有最少35人出席,如果不足人数,必须流会,而且六个月内不可重提相同议案。相对的由董事局召开的大会就算低至二人,也可进行。
后果:将来一旦遇上不负责任的董事会采取技术手段通过不寻常议案,严重削弱会员行使监督与制衡董事会的力量。


911
修改后:-增加委任董事。
后果:进一步操控董事局,严重影响内部监管。


10
修改后:-允许董事会在大会预先批准的情况下,抵押校产,甚至发出债券(debenture),当中又包括全部动产与不动产,总值超过3亿(RM300000000)。
后果:极可能让华社近百年来的心血毁于一旦


总结:如果修改11章程不幸通过,宽中百年基业随时可能化为


乌有,到时呼天不应,叫地不灵。


提案2:授权董事会动用学校流动资金不超过600万令吉作为投资收益事:-
这是百年来未曾发生过的事:动用学生的学费,教职员的薪金,水电杂费来融资投资!万一资金不能及时回笼,难到教职员要向董事会老板们借粮吗?学生挑灯上课吗?出现这种情况,广大华社还允许我们重头再来吗?


提案3:授权董事会洽购lot603属于吴家的地段事:-
授权无说明数额顶限,透明度何在?董事诸公人人皆是商界杰出人士,产业必须有基本估价报告,才可向股东及相关人士交待,更何况是公家事业。

宽中原本就是一个教育机构,投资从来不事我们的选项,专注发展教育才是我们唯一的选择。宽中董事局唯一的使命就是全心全意执行华社的共同意愿,让我们回復根本







 记者招待会通告


至 : 各大媒体 (马来西亚和外国媒体)
日期:2009年10月22日(星期四)
时间:下午3点 - 4点正
地点:吉隆坡雪华堂1楼会议厅 
No. 1, Jalan Maharajalela, 
50150 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
事项:宽柔特大危机
 我们希望各大媒体能够出席并报道这个事件。我们不能让宽柔中学通过议案。


这里下载:
http://rapidshare.com/files/295810353/FoonYewCrisis.pdf.html


http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=81cec293648115340de4fc1039a01674e04e75f6e8ebb871

31 条评论:

  1. i never know that Foon Yew High School is so rich that they could hire investment professional to help them invest their asset.

    by the way, what the hell on earth does a high school need to raise money every year with the hefty amount of working capital on hand???

    回复删除
  2. besides that, i doubt their professional knowledge in investment albeit their background in business. we must understand that Investment is not an usual business.

    i suggest they amend their constitution to only invest in highly liquid and zero risk asset only. for eg, government bond.

    回复删除
  3. we are not an profit organization, school supposed to be a Non-profit organization.. and the good thing about chinese school is they are still keeping the chinese culture by promoting confucianist...

    even though they reason behind for amending the constitution is for the benefit and the development of Foon Yew... But we all know that all the profits & loss has never been clear to release to the public..

    this is juz another pipeline for those heartless committee to earn money by using our school's "Branding"...

    ---Veron Oon

    回复删除
  4. 个人认为,现在面临股严重的金融危机,各方理应努力地筹钱挨冬。大家都害怕公家的资产血本无归,所以董事会应该针对风险给大众一个交代。此外一旦真的有赚钱,董事会也该调高教职员薪金和调低学费,让大众看到风险投资对师生的帮助。
    入会费300并不会有多大影响吧~我也可以当会员啊~反而如果用30就能入会,更容易使有心人收买会员。要有一百人入会也只不过用3000.(这好象是董事会1965年来第一次修改章程,当时的30币值应该比较高,请各方指教)。
    无论如何,个人希望看到有专业人士或局内人发表看法。我既非懂事又不是读商的,也没什么资格评定对错。我只是关注宽中发展的小咖。

    回复删除
  5. 主要问题不是会费什么的。。。

    主要还是投资,动用流动资金以及抵押校产的便利....

    回复删除
  6. Why the press conference is not held in JB but KL? I thought if JB people who is the main supporters of foon yew agrees with your points can back you up in the conference.

    回复删除
  7. 真是無中生有, 不知道真相, 不查清楚事實, 也懶惰去學校找有關單位詢問的人想利用網絡來搞事情。

    就看25號這個到處貼無聊啓事的人會不會出席會員大會吧 (什麽特大? 馬華嗎?)

    最好是有。

    回复删除
  8. 全世界許多著名大學例如哈佛都有自己的基金會作爲投資為學校籌款事宜, 凡事都委任專人處理。

    投資為學校湊錢就是不注重教育?

    非營利的董事有分享利潤的權利? 去看點書吧。

    真是沒腦。豬頭。

    回复删除
  9. 学校不能冒这险
    如果没有的话。。。。
    影响的不止在籍的所有师生
    有整整好几千人了。。。。
    还影响了大部人柔佛华人的心
    而且我们又怎样能对得起创校人
    或许投资成功真的可以给我们带来许多利益
    但我们要做最坏的打算。。。。
    宽中这几十年来。。。不是好好的吗?

    回复删除
  10. While I was a student there, I always heard that Foon Yew was poor, that’s why we raised money every year during the anniversary in order to keep the school going. Foon Yew is not a profitable organisation, it’s only giving the best education and to profit all the Chinese people in Malaysia.

    All these selfish people are making me sick. They are using everyone's money to risk and gain profit for themselves. If they fail, Foon Yew will be closing down and even if they success how much money will they really give it back to Foon Yew. I would say NONE!

    100 years of successful education, Foon Yew High School has created so many great people around Malaysia and oversea. We are Chinese, we are Malaysian Chinese and Foon Yew is part of our culture. We should be proud to have such a historical school that brings us all the memories.

    No matter where I am, I will always be supporting you, my Foon Yew.

    Love.


    Sen Wong

    回复删除
  11. 太过分了!!!!
    现在一直要闹大这件事情 想怎样
    要宽中倒吗?
    最好是有这件事情
    无聊人一堆!!!!
    一旦这件事情闹开 学校就完了 学生也会完蛋
    难道大家没想过吗?
    一直说反对要集合大家 有用啊?
    现在是要提醒他们不可以这样做 不是一直在这里集合大家去反对!!

    如果给你们反对成功了又怎样
    宽中的名誉就这样跌了一大半
    家长对宽中就此失去了信心
    那后代的华人子弟们怎么办?
    大家有想过没有?

    够了!够了!真是够了!!!

    回复删除
  12. 新山的宽柔人快站出来......
    不要让有商业恶徒的无良XX人,破壞華社教育根基, 把宽中的资产做抵押,以进行投资...

    不要让先賢的努力.......化為烏有.....


    爱我宽柔 造福人群
    关心华教, 关心宽柔

    Memory from those who study in FY high school.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2A0tLHKVA0

    回复删除
  13. 知道这个事件的新山华团和政党都不要出声。而且主流媒体封锁我们发布的新闻。看看董事名单就知道原因了。

    我们只好用最传统的集会方法让董事们取消特大。我们别无选择。希望有良知的董事会站出来反对。我们想要宽中好,独中好。

    当中文报纸都去大量报导政党和华团的内部斗争。请问他们事实上还代表华人吗 ?

    扪心自问,我们最后的堡垒就是华教了。。这是绝对不能被人钻空子的。。。这是历代祖先废了好大的气力才维持住的。试想想我们还有中文论坛。能用中文沟通。邻国们印尼泰国新加坡有吗?

    希望热爱华教的人可以参加我们星期天的大集会。我们相信反对的人越多,他们是会放弃的。也希望大家把这个消息告诉你身边所有热爱华教的人

    回复删除
  14. 坚决反对,反对董事部霸权!!!!
    宽中是大家的,不是某人的私有财产。。。

    爱宽柔的宽柔人

    回复删除
  15. 哈佛是有商学院,有人才
    而且可以让学生适应市场的运作

    我们只是中学。。。有人才吗?

    华尔街天才在金融风暴都失利
    难道我们比华尔街的天才还能干?
    难道我们能担保人性将来不贪?
    是要让另一个NKF出现?
    另一个仁慈出现?
    现在避免,总比以后发生,校誉更加完蛋

    叫他们把只能用利息投资写进article里啦!
    看他们要不要??

    回复删除
  16. 你才看多点书
    要吞钱不是用分享利润那么笨的方法

    回复删除
  17. 我很好奇那个“总协调”是宽中人??
    如果是,我想应该是真的很关心款中的发展。
    不然,背后的议程是。。。?

    回复删除
  18. i was so astonished that someone could ever been so ignorance. To compare Harvard University Endowment Fund with Foon Yew high School reserve fund. Who the hell do you think you are???

    Harvard Endowment fund is managed by a pool of professionals. Their fund size is more than US$20 billion. Given this economy of scale, they are able to hire professional to manage their money.

    Let me ask you, how many CFA holders in the board of directors. Don't tell me how many successful businessmen are sit on the board. Successful businessman might not be a good investor.

    you should be the one to read more books before coming to this place and yelling like a mad dog.

    THE POWER OF WORD WILL NEVER VANISH.
    YOUR INTEGRITY HAS FADED AWAY.
    NOW IS THE TIME TO EXPOSE YOUR HYPOCRISY.
    PIG HEAD.

    回复删除
  19. 越来越精彩了。

    回复删除
  20. I just hope that the "most" of the directors are really getting this thing on the right way if they really decide to make this change.

    I suppose that many people will use "most" instead of "all" because we all know that if there's a big and fat fish on the table, some of them will surely CUT and SLICE and EAT the fish until the bones are seen.

    But if things went right, Foon Yew student will be able to stop raising fund for the school, or maybe to a lesser extent that we do not have to go around the streets and beg for money anymore and may just have to rely on some big donors for their big donations.

    But things do go wrong most of the time and I just hope that our 3 billion assets will not go down into Stulang Laut or into the pockets of some unscrupulous idiots.

    Foon Yew takes nearly 100 years to build but it only needs a single mistake to be destroyed.

    Once from Foon Yew, always shall we be with Foon Yew.

    回复删除
  21. the board of directors is the culprit who consistently ruined foon yew's reputation. how dare you inverted the truth and misleading everyone???

    I don't know what is a safe investment if the constitution allows a few people to pledge foon yew asset for a bank loan. what if the investment turns sour?? what will happen to the existing student???

    I hereby overthrow all the falseful explanation by some wicked "anonymous" guy who claimed that we want to destroy foon yew. the fact is, no matter what, the board of director is to make sure the sustainability of foon yew operation, not to turn into an investment holding company.

    They think foon yew produces high standard students every year. well, that's not true. you can't propagate the small portion of students who are already very smart. the general students' result and performance should be gauged as the performance indicator. so, who dare to say there is more than 20% of foon yew students can command good english???? they should invest the money in lifting up this very important issue.

    回复删除
  22. Oh yea I bet they should invest the money on implementing all sorts of ways to improve the standard of our english language, particulary some blurred "anonymous" who mistook my words for saying the things that I don't quite understand at first but have to re-read for several times until I got the message.

    The "mistake" I was refering to is a mistake that I'm worried and concerned as much as you are, which means I'm also afraid that our 3 billion assets will go down in drain and at the same time jeopardizing the future of our fellow foon yew students just in case things turn sour and nasty.

    And please, learning english is not a one-day-task. It requires not only the help from the school, but also the students' will and motivation to learn and comprehend in that language. It takes YEARS. Why not ask yourself how long did you take to learn how to speak good english and score 8 for ielts?

    Opps... Went too far... Now back to the crisis. I want the directors to stop this nonsense.

    回复删除
  23. now it is "3 billion"...oh my god!!
    we got so much money

    回复删除
  24. 一直用英文
    那些看不懂的人都不知道你们在讲什么
    都在人云亦云

    一开始讲危机
    每个人就支持

    后来知道召集者是谁
    就全部说不支持

    我还是一句话
    从以前在宽中求学的时候就很希望学校须具透明化
    之后知道这个是corporate governance
    排除其他因素(张先生还是陈先生背景)

    这次提案让我们最在意的是:
    为什么要投票能够抵押校产?
    为什么可以动用储备?
    怎样投资?
    到底谁监管?????!!!!!!!!!

    大家不要人云亦云
    请有自己主见

    我是很乐意大家因为这次的事件
    好好深思
    学校是不是监管制度不完善??
    是不是应该改善??给华社交代?

    回复删除
  25. did you see the problem?? this is FOon yew high school english standard. i had never used any bombastic vocabulary or rhetorical phrases. all i wanted to express here is to let everyone to understand the simple idea. we shall never let a public asset falls into the hand of a few people. foon yew high school will remain as an education institution, it SHALL never turn into an investment institution.

    the mindful person always tries to inverted the truth by exposing the ugly side of the initiator. not to mention the motive of the initiator, we still have stand up and oppose the bill.

    what is the rationale to pledge foon yew asset for a bank loan???
    Do you think you can generate more than 10% of return on the investment with 100% guanrantee??
    if that is the case, why don't you take up the bank loan and make the investment yourself and keep all the profit.
    the logic is very simple, anyone who still could not understand me should simply bash your own head. you are way to stupid.

    my suggestion, since the board of directors are so successful in business, why don't they invest their own money and donate a portion of the profit to foonyew??

    the investment will never perform well. because it is a public asset.

    爱我宽柔
    董事们
    捐钱来抗通膨吧。

    回复删除
  26. 大家背后的议程-
    就是阻止无耻之徒滥用华社多年来辛苦建立起来的华教根基。

    如果议程通过,董事们的道德操守,大家也可见一斑。

    回复删除
  27. 你要让大家知道
    就不要一直用英文
    还真的宽柔英文程度低落是不争的事实~~

    要让各阶层人士都明白最好的方法是用华语表达~~

    u don't expect everyone in this country speak or read english
    but when it comes to this issue
    i think everyone concerns do know how to read chinese

    回复删除
  28. 對啦對啦, 都是董事們不懂事,把錢拿來玩, 導致寬中不夠錢把英文搞好。

    哈佛也發生過專門負責籌款的經紀私下吞了幾百萬叻。 按照那個邏輯來講, 寬中董事‘肯定’會吃錢的啦。

    爲了辯論而辯論。

    奇怪叻, 這位仁兄那麽‘關心’寬中, 花個300大洋做會員去和董事們辯論個夠吧。 在這邊講廢話, 誤導一大票不知詳情的人。

    連會員都不是, 只敢在網上高談闊論, 卒仔。

    就是說你, 沒讀過書的 , 不要以爲 用英文就高人一等了。

    豬腦。

    回复删除
  29. http://www.wretch.cc/blog/Terminator77 ( 不 能 说 的 秘 密〕

    回复删除
  30. 就是怕吃钱发生咯。这么大块的鱼,想必除了郭老先生以外,其他剩下的都会吃到撑死吧? 让我数一数3亿有几个0。

    一个,两个,三个,四个,五个。。。九个!!!!

    回复删除
  31. 预防胜于治疗

    回复删除

关注者